廣告
香港股市 已收市
  • 恒指

    16,541.42
    +148.58 (+0.91%)
     
  • 國指

    5,810.79
    +82.66 (+1.44%)
     
  • 上證綜指

    3,041.17
    +30.50 (+1.01%)
     
  • 滬深300

    3,537.48
    +16.52 (+0.47%)
     
  • 美元

    7.8258
    +0.0002 (+0.00%)
     
  • 人民幣

    0.9220
    -0.0008 (-0.09%)
     
  • 道指

    39,807.40
    +47.29 (+0.12%)
     
  • 標普 500

    5,254.35
    +5.86 (+0.11%)
     
  • 納指

    16,379.46
    -20.06 (-0.12%)
     
  • 日圓

    0.0515
    +0.0001 (+0.10%)
     
  • 歐元

    8.4486
    +0.0081 (+0.10%)
     
  • 英鎊

    9.8930
    +0.0170 (+0.17%)
     
  • 紐約期油

    83.11
    -0.06 (-0.07%)
     
  • 金價

    2,254.80
    +16.40 (+0.73%)
     
  • Bitcoin

    70,463.21
    -424.00 (-0.60%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    885.54
    0.00 (0.00%)
     

Two of the richest crypto bros saw nearly $2 billion wiped off their combined wealth following Binance and Coinbase crackdown

Zed Jameson—Bloomberg via Getty Images

This week’s U.S. government crackdown on crypto trading platforms Binance and Coinbase come at a hefty price tag for their billionaire founders, Changpeng Zhao and Brian Armstrong.

Nearly $2 billion of their combined wealth has been wiped away after the Securities and Exchange Commission, which claims responsibility for regulating virtually all of the 25,000 digital tokens in existence, filed lawsuits alleging both crypto exchanges operated unlawfully.

According to Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Coinbase CEO Armstrong saw his wealth melt by $361 million to $2.2 billion as shares in the publicly traded company sank by 12% on Tuesday.

This loss is paltry once compared to the $1.4 billion plunge suffered by Zhao, the richest of all crypto bros and known more colloquially as CZ.

廣告

His wealth shrank to $26 billion, in part after the SEC chair Gary Gensler singled out the founder of the privately held Binance, the world’s largest crypto trading platform, for an “extensive web of deception, conflicts of interest, lack of disclosure, and calculated evasion of the law.”

Their wealth had been climbing since the start of this year as the price of Bitcoin and other digital assets rebounded. Zhao’s fortune soared by 117% before this week’s drop, while Armstrong’s jumped by 61%.

By comparison, the other billionaires on Bloomberg’s wealth index were up a combined 9%.

Unlike the anger that erupted when Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX went bankrupt amid an apparent web of lies and fraud, the crypto community has largely rallied around Zhao, Armstrong and their two exchanges.

Although they are centralized like much of traditional finance, or TradFi as it's pejoratively known, Binance and Coinbase play important roles in facilitating the broader adoption of crypto.

That solidarity stems in part from suspicions this week’s coordinated attack was politically motivated with the purpose of maintaining the dominant role of conventional central bank-backed currencies in all commerce.

Charles Hoskinson, the creator of the Cardano blockchain and its native ADA coin that is the world's seventh most valuable cryptocurrency, pitched the SEC’s move against the digital ecosystem in almost Manichean terms.

In remarks he posted to social media on Tuesday, he went so far as to liken the industry’s common struggle for what he termed economic freedom from government fiat to the time when his Norwegian ancestors fought against the Nazis.

“We will see a day where, when you have money in your wallet, you own that—not an IOU from an organization that at any time can take it from you for no particular reason, or you violated a particular policy or agenda,” said Hoskinson. “The reality is we’re facing the entire global order.”

Gensler helped fuel the community’s suspicions on Tuesday when he argued that crypto serves no real purpose since traditional finance such as banks and stock exchanges already execute payments virtually.

“Look, we don’t need more digital currency. We already have digital currency: it’s called the U.S. dollar,” he said in an interview with CNBC. “It’s all digital right now—the investing world—so what is the real underlying value of these tokens?”

Appearing on the same broadcaster the following day, Armstrong said he was “disappointed” by the SEC’s actions, arguing they were “not good for America.”

“We don’t need the government picking and choosing our technology winners. Let’s let the market decide,” he said.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

More from Fortune:
5 side hustles where you may earn over $20,000 per year—all while working from home
Looking to make extra cash? This CD has a 5.15% APY right now
Buying a house? Here's how much to save
This is how much money you need to earn annually to comfortably buy a $600,000 home