(Bloomberg Law) -- The US Supreme Court sided with Starbucks Corp. over the National Labor Relations Board in a decision that will make it more difficult for the agency to win temporary reinstatement of workers fired during labor disputes.Most Read from BloombergWells Fargo Fires Over a Dozen for ‘Simulation of Keyboard Activity’Apple to ‘Pay’ OpenAI for ChatGPT Through Distribution, Not CashHunter Biden Was Convicted. His Dad’s Reaction Was Remarkable.US Producer Prices Surprise With Biggest De
Jack In The Box (JACK) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues.
The U.S. Supreme Court sided on Thursday with Starbucks in the coffee chain's challenge to a judicial order to rehire seven Memphis employees fired as they sought to unionize in a ruling that could make it harder for courts to quickly halt labor practices contested as unfair under federal law. The justices unanimously threw out a lower court's approval of an injunction sought by the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ordering Starbucks to reinstate the workers while the agency's in-house administrative case against the Seattle-based company proceeds. Starbucks had argued that the judge in the Memphis case should have used a stringent four-factor test to weigh the bid for an injunction, similar to the standard used by some other courts and in non-labor legal disputes.